SALVATI v. SALVATI

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

While the court, upon resettlement, cannot change the substance of the judgment, it does have the power to make clerical amendments to correct provisions clearly intended by the parties (see, CPLR 5019; Haven Assocs. v. Donro Realty Corp., 149 A.D.2d 667). Here, the plaintiff proposed only a technical amendment in order to allow her to collect the pension funds she was entitled to. Therefore, we find that the Supreme Court properly amended the judgment. Mangano, P.J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.