- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ROBINSON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 31, 1994
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's statements during summation warrant reversal is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Washington, 197 A.D.2d 720; People v. Bruen, 136 A.D.2d 648). In any event, the prosecutor's statements constituted fair response to the defendant's summation and did not unduly prejudice the defendant so as to deprive him of a fair trial (see, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Ashwal, 39 N.Y.2d 105; People v. Paulino, 187 A.D.2d 736; People v. Roopchand, 107 A.D.2d 35, affd 65 N.Y.2d 837). Ritter, J.P., Copertino, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.