- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
NEWELL v. SWISS REASSURANCE COMPANY, INC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Dec 13, 1994
Plaintiff failed to offer proof sufficient to rebut defendants' showing that because of the absence of past criminal acts, the attack on plaintiff on the 16th floor of the premises was not foreseeable (Grignoli v New York City Hous. Auth., 196 A.D.2d 525).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.