Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

NEWELL v. SWISS REASSURANCE COMPANY, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Dec 13, 1994

Plaintiff failed to offer proof sufficient to rebut defendants' showing that because of the absence of past criminal acts, the attack on plaintiff on the 16th floor of the premises was not foreseeable (Grignoli v New York City Hous. Auth., 196 A.D.2d 525).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.