CHRYSLER 1ST FIN. SERV. CORP OF AM. v. BURSE

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly vacated the default judgment against defendant James D. Burse. That judgment was a nullity because it was not entered in compliance with CPLR 308 (4) (see, Marazita v Nelbach, 91 A.D.2d 604).

The court erred, however, in failing to vacate the default judgment against defendant Patricia Burse based on plaintiff's failure to comply with the five-day notice requirement of CPLR 3215 (g) (1) (cf., Q.P.I. Rests. v Slevin, 93 A.D.2d 767, appeal dismissed 60 N.Y.2d 676).