Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DEPIETRO

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 30, 1994
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand Harry J. DePietro. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.

PFEIFER, J., dissenting.

The facts as presented in this case do not merit disciplinary action. However, respondent did agree with the panel's recommendation of a public reprimand. If there are some other facts that yielded this result, they should be revealed to this court. If not, the case should be dismissed.