Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

25 EAST 83 CORP. v. 83RD STREET ASSOCIATES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 21, 1995

It is settled that only a prevailing party is ordinarily entitled to attorney's fees and that to be considered a prevailing party, there must be success with respect to the central relief sought (Nestor v. McDowell, 81 N.Y.2d 410, 415-416). Applying that standard, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff was not the prevailing party since all of its substantive claims, including the first cause of action for unpaid maintenance, were dismissed. In fact, by successfully defending against plaintiff's lawsuit, defendant must be regarded as the prevailing party. We therefore remand for a hearing to determine the appropriate award of defendant's counsel fees, without costs.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.