FRICKER v. NEW YORK CITY OFF TRACK BETTING

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the record reveals that the court's charge, as a whole, sufficiently instructed the jury about the law of proximate cause and the factual issues to be resolved (see, Scandell v. Salerno, 155 A.D.2d 523; Bartlett v General Elec. Co., 90 A.D.2d 183).

We have examined the plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.