Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Apr 25, 1995
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

We reject defendant's contention that an expired credit card is not a "credit card" within the meaning of General Business Law § 511 (1), and, accordingly, we find the proof was sufficient to establish that he was guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (People v Winfield, 145 A.D.2d 449, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 1024). The court's instruction to the jury that a credit card that has expired is a credit card within the meaning of Penal Law § 165.45 (2) was an issue which involved the interpretation of a law and, hence, properly within the province of the court and not the jury (see, Bush v Delaware, Lackawanna W.R.R. Co., 166 N.Y. 210, 226). Whether the Visa card in evidence was a credit card was properly left to the jury to determine since the nature of the credit card, including its expiration date, was a factor which the jury could consider with respect to the elements of the crime.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.