DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MBAKPUO

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board's finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 2-102(A)(4) and (C); 2-106(A); 3-101(B); 6-101(A)(3); and 7-101(A)(3); and Gov. Bar R. V(4)(G). We further concur in the recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio indefinitely. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

RESNICK, J., dissents and would disbar respondent.