PECK v. SONY MUSIC CORPORATION

Executive Law § 296 (6) and (7) provide that an individual may be held liable for aiding and abetting discriminatory conduct. Patrowich v Chemical Bank ( 63 N.Y.2d 541) is not a bar to maintenance of the action. Here, there are issues of fact as to defendant-appellant's liability under Executive Law § 296 (6) and (7) as an aider and abettor of the alleged discriminatory conduct.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.