Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. GILCHRIST

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jan 9, 1996

The New Jersey robbery statute under which defendant was previously convicted (NJ Stat Annot § 2C:15-1 [a] [2]) punishes the knowing use of force in the immediate flight from a theft, while the New York robbery statute (Penal Law § 160.00) punishes only the use of force with the intent to compel a person to give up his property or prevent resistance to the taking. As the People concede, since the New Jersey statute is broader and proscribes conduct that is not a felony in New York and it cannot be determined from the New Jersey indictment at what point in the robbery defendant utilized force ( see, People v Muniz, 74 N.Y.2d 464, 467-468), this foreign conviction should not have been considered as a predicate felony for the purpose of enhanced sentencing. Defendant's sentence is vacated and the case is remanded so that defendant may be resentenced as a first time felony offender.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.