PEOPLE v. PLACENCIA

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, there was no "unnecessary delay" in his arraignment (CPL 140.20; see, People v Wilson, 56 N.Y.2d 692; People v Blake, 35 N.Y.2d 331; People v Quartieri, 171 A.D.2d 889; People v Cooper, 101 A.D.2d 1).

The defendant's confession was voluntary and does not warrant suppression ( see, People v Ortlieb, 84 N.Y.2d 989).

The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive a sentence within a certain scope; such a sentence was thereafter imposed. Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence is excessive ( see, People v Gelzer, 212 A.D.2d 630; People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Altman, JJ., concur.