PEOPLE v. WESTON

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's assertion on appeal, the first count of the indictment, which designated the crime with which the defendant was charged by name and section number and tracked the language of the relevant Penal Law provision, was not jurisdictionally defective (see, People v Levin, 57 N.Y.2d 1008; People v Cohen, 52 N.Y.2d 584; People v Willett, 102 N.Y. 251; People v Salvato, 111 A.D.2d 773).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.