Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SATCHELL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 14, 1996
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 specifies format and content for notices of cancellation of automobile insurance liability policies, and the failure to strictly comply with its provisions invalidates such notice ( Barile v Kavanaugh, 67 N.Y.2d 392, 399; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Stollerman], 50 N.Y.2d 895, affg for reasons stated at 70 A.D.2d 643; Matter of Worldwide Underwriters Ins. Co. v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 181 A.D.2d 784, 786; Matter of Wausau Ins. Cos. v Harpaul, 90 A.D.2d 711).

15 NYCRR 34.6 (b) requires that the cancellation notice include a specification that suspension of the automobile registration can be avoided by payment of a civil penalty of $6 per day for each day the insurance coverage is not in effect. The Aetna notice in question incorrectly indicated that the civil penalty was $4 per day, which was the formerly applicable rate.

Since the regulatory requirements of 15 NYCRR 34.6 are no less mandatory than the statutory requirements of the Vehicle and Traffic Law ( Matter of USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v Belizaire, 154 A.D.2d 603, 604; Matter of Wausau Ins. Co. v Ramos, 151 A.D.2d 487), we find the purported cancellation to be ineffective.

Accordingly, the petition to stay arbitration is granted.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.