- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. MORILLO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 26, 1996
Defendant's contention that the police improperly used his mother and sister "as their agents to coax [him] into speaking" is without merit, since the record indicates that defendant's spontaneous incriminating statement was the result of a voluntary change of mind ( People v Kinnard, 62 N.Y.2d 910), not police action involving the use of his relatives. While the detective had commented to the relatives that defendant "should try to help himself in cooperating", there is no indication that defendant's relatives conveyed the detective's suggestion to defendant. We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.