SCROFINI v. SEBOLLENA

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The court correctly determined that the continuous treatment doctrine does not apply and dismissed the action as untimely ( see, Jorge v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 79 N.Y.2d 905). Sullivan, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.