- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. HOLMES
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Apr 19, 1996
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly revoked the sentence of probation based upon defendant's admitted failure to make timely monthly restitution payments ( see, People v. Ray, 105 A.D.2d 988). The sentence of two to six years' imprisonment is not unduly harsh or severe.
In his pro se supplemental brief, defendant challenges the propriety of the original sentence of probation and the amount of restitution fixed by the court as a condition of that sentence. Those arguments are not properly before us on appeal from the judgment revoking the sentence of probation and resentencing defendant ( see, CPL 450.30; People v. Dabbs, 178 A.D.2d 848, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 946).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.