- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. TIEN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jun 13, 1996
Defendant's claim that his plea was coerced by the court is unpreserved as a matter of law since he never moved to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction ( People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662). In any event, it was not coercive for the court to inform defendant as to the possible sentences available under the indictment ( People v. Crafton, 159 A.D.2d 271, 272, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 733). The record does not support defendant's claim that the court "threatened" to impose a greater sentence if defendant opted to go to trial, and the lengthy plea colloquy otherwise shows that the plea was voluntary and knowing.
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.