PEOPLE v. ROMAN

A review of defendant's testimony before the Grand Jury reveals that he was in no way prevented from fully presenting his narrative account, and thus there was compliance with CPL 190.50 (5) (b).

We have considered defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.