Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MEARS v. MARSHALL

Oregon Supreme Court.
Aug 29, 1996
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

CC 9307-04839; CA A85078; SC S43073

Attorney(S)

Maureen Leonard and Kathryn J. Clarke, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review. Eric J. Neiman, of Tooze Shenker Duden Creamer Frank Hutchison, Portland, and Joe W. Redden, Jr., of Beck, Redden Secrest, Houston, filed a response for respondent on review Collagen Corporation.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 US ___, 116 S Ct 2240, 135 L Ed 2d 700 (1996).

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x