- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. SKINNER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 8, 1996
There is no merit to defendant's unpreserved argument that the plea agreement was altered by the sentencing court's comments that the prosecutor and the victim's family "can and should communicate with the Parole Board" and that it would make the papers submitted by the victim's family available to the Parole Board ( see, People v Saldana, 221 AD2d 239, 240, lv denied 87 NY2d 1024).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.