PEOPLE v. CERVINO

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that the court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty without conducting a hearing. Since the defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions, and the court was able to make an informed decision, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in failing to conduct a hearing ( see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927; People v Jaworowski, 201 AD2d 504). Moreover, the defendant's motion was without merit ( see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; see also, People v Rogers, 228 AD2d 623; People v Kelly, 198 AD2d 305; People v Bourdonnay, 160 AD2d 1014, 1015).