- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. JUAN FLORES
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 28, 1996
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the complainant's identification of the defendant was a witness-initiated procedure and identification ( see, People v Dixon, 85 NY2d 218), and did not constitute an unduly suggestive showup. Nor did the complainant's trial testimony constitute improper bolstering ( see, CPL 60.30).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or lacking in merit.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.