AFTUCK v. AFTUCK

Yesawich Jr., J.

The appeal must be dismissed. Defendant's motion to "modify" the judgment so as to eliminate therefrom the sum of $9,658.44 in interest was, in essence, an application to resettle the judgment in its substantive or decretal provisions, the denial of which is not appealable ( see, Brennan v Breezy Point Coop., 124 AD2d 772, appeal dismissed, Iv dismissed 70 NY2d 641, 782; Cohn v Cohn, 100 AD2d 528).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.