Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

NOBLE v. BOARD OF PAROLE

Oregon Court of Appeals.
Dec 11, 1996
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision establishing conditions of parole, including declarations that petitioner is a high risk dangerous offender and a predatory sex offender. ORS 181.585 to ORS 181.589.

Petitioner's arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or. App. 327, 912 P.2d 403, rev den 324 Or. 78 (1996), Gress v. Board of Parole, 143 Or. App. 7, 924 P.2d 329, on recons 144 Or. App. 375, 927 P.2d 138 (1996), and Coleman v. Board of Parole, 144 Or. App. 487, 927 P.2d 622 (1996).

Affirmed.