Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

LIEBERT v. GELBWAKS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Dec 19, 1996
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

We find that the award of treble damages against defendant Gelbwaks must be set aside. The statute at issue, Judiciary Law ยง 487 (2), provides, in pertinent part: "An attorney or counselor who * * * wilfully receives any money or allowance for or on account of any money which he has not laid out, or becomes answerable for * * * forfeits to the party injured treble damages, to be recovered in a civil action." While the evidence is sufficient to demonstrate that defendant Gelbwaks had, as the jury found, breached his fiduciary duty and was liable to plaintiff for the amounts released from his escrow account to defendant Levine pursuant to plaintiffs power of attorney, it is insufficient to show that he actually participated in the transactions in a manner that would constitute willful receipt of the subject funds within the meaning of the statute, a necessary element forimposition of treble damages.