Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. WIMBUSH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 23, 1996

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he should have received youthful offender treatment is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v McGowen, 42 NY2d 905; People v Arimont, 161 AD2d 769).

Additionally, the defendant received the sentence he bargained for and, therefore, has no cause to complain that his sentence is excessive ( see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).