Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. BERRY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jan 21, 1997
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the record demonstrates that as a condition of his plea of guilty he knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily waived appellate review of "anything that's already happened in [this] case" ( see, People v Cavi, 89 NY2d 868; People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761). Additionally, after a thorough explanation of his rights, the defendant expressly agreed to waive appellate review of the denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress a gun and identification evidence ( see, People v Capone, 229 AD2d 445; People v Maize, 226 AD2d 654; People v Byrd, 225 AD2d 631; People v Sebastian, 197 AD2d 647). Therefore, appellate review of the suppression issues the defendant presently attempts to raise is unavailable.