GALARZA v. WALGREEN EASTERN COMPANY, INC

We reject defendant supermarket's contention that there is no evidence from which a jury could infer that it had constructive notice of the dangerous condition that allegedly caused plaintiffs fall, where plaintiffs bill of particulars, deposition testimony and opposing affidavit alleged the "whole" aisle in which she fell was covered with, among other things, wet and dry green liquid and foot marks indicating that the liquid had been "stepped on" ( see, Negri v Stop Shop, 65 NY2d 625; Salaam v City of New York, 226 AD2d 173; cf., Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838).