Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. CANNON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Feb 20, 1997
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

The merger doctrine does not require dismissal of the kidnapping count because the gunpoint kidnapping, that including handcuffing and abandonment of the victim in an isolated area, "was not a minimal intrusion necessary and integral to another crime" ( People v Gonzalez, 80 NY2d 146, 153).

The People laid sufficient foundation, through a police witness, for admission of a photograph of defendant standing next to a measuring device. Any error in either the sufficiency of the foundation, or the timing of disclosure of the photograph, was harmless in light of the witness's inability to offer a conclusion as to defendant's height based on the photograph, and in light of counsel's exhaustive exploration of inconsistencies in evidence regarding the actual height of defendant, who had absented himself from trial ( see, People v Rosario, 124 AD2d 683, lv denied 69 NY2d 833).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.