- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
REMENESKI v. McDONALD
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 25, 1997
The damages awarded to plaintiff did not deviate from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501 [c]). Plaintiff sustained a debilitating wrist fracture as well as a significant complex tear of the medial meniscus of the knee, each causing progressive and permanent disability ( see, Kotopoulos v Nathan Hale Gardens, 235 AD2d 276; Rodriguez v City of New York, 191 AD2d 420; Gonzalez v Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 160 AD2d 420).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.