Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MOBIL ADMINISTRATIVE v. MANSFIELD

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
May 9, 1997
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Steven R. Irwin argued the cause for intervenor ( Mandelbaum Mandelbaum, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Irwin, of counsel; Alan Vuernick, on the brief). Edward M. Dunne argued the cause for respondent Mansfield Township ( Valentino, Dunne Stein, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Dunne, of counsel and on the brief). Kenneth R. Kosco argued the cause for respondent Mobil Administrative Services Co. ( Garippa Davenport, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Kosco, of counsel and on the brief).

JUDGES

PER CURIAM.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Zeta Consumer Products Corporation appeals from the denial of its application made to the Tax Court to intervene in pending litigation contesting the tax assessment of property the appellant had purchased. Appellant was held to have lacked the requisite standing to intervene as required by R. 4:33-1.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kuskin in his thorough and well-reasoned opinion reported at 15 N.J.Tax 583 (Tax Ct. 1996).

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x