PEOPLE v. JAMES

Having failed to move to withdraw his plea on the specific grounds now asserted on appeal, defendant's current claim that he was inadequately warned that a violation of the plea conditions would result in an enhanced sentence is unpreserved for appellate review ( People v. Mackey, 77 N.Y.2d 846), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find it without merit ( People v. Cruz, 237 A.D.2d 218), and that defendant's use of false pedigree information to obtain a favorable plea bargain independently justified an enhanced sentence with no option to withdraw the plea ( supra).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.