PEOPLE v. RUDENKO

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

Further, there is no merit to the defendant's contention that the court erroneously failed to impose appropriate sanctions upon the People for a Rosario violation ( see, People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 386 U.S. 866). The sanctions sought by the defendant were more drastic than the situation warranted ( see, People v. Joseph, 86 N.Y.2d 565, 570; People v. Martinez, 71 N.Y.2d 937, 940).

The defendant's remaining contentions lack merit or are unpreserved for appellate review.

Miller, J.P., Copertino, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.