CONNOR v. BLODNICK ABRAMOWITZ BLODNICK

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth causes of action, since, with respect to those claims, the defendants established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and the plaintiff failed to proffer sufficient proof to demonstrate the existence of material issues of fact ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).

Miller, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.