Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PATTERSON v. ANDERSON AVENUE ASSOCIATES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Sep 4, 1997

CPLR 3403 (a)(3) allows the court to analyze each request for a preference in light of the unique circumstances of that case (Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3403:4; see, Smith v. Schnabel, 34 A.D.2d 603). We find that plaintiff's proofs of a serious injury worsening over time, his inability to work, and his role as a single parent of four children (ages 4 to 12) subsisting on Social Security disability benefits of about $1,000 per month, present a case in which the interests of justice will be served by an early trial ( Kellman v 45 Tiemann Assocs., 213 A.D.2d 151, affd on other grounds 87 N.Y.2d 871; Zangiacomi v. Hood, 193 A.D.2d 188; Thompson v. City of New York, 140 A.D.2d 232).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Tom, JJ.