CLARKIN v. STATEN ISLAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for leave to amend its answer to assert the affirmative defense of culpable conduct on the part of the plaintiff Donald Clarkin. In general, amendments to pleadings are to be liberally granted ( see, CPLR 3025 [b]). Where, however, an action has long been certified as ready for trial, judicial discretion in allowing such amendments should be discrete, circumspect, prudent, and cautious ( Perricone v. City of New York, 96 A.D.2d 531, 533, aff'd 62 N.Y.2d 661). Here the application for leave to amend was made approximately two years after the filing of the note of issue and the certificate of readiness, the proposed amendment was based upon factual circumstances known at the time the action was commenced approximately four years prior thereto, and the defendant failed to show a reasonable excuse for its inordinate delay in moving to amend ( see, Rose v. Velletri, 202 A.D.2d 566; F.G.L. Knitting Mills v. 1087 Flushing Prop., 191 A.D.2d 533, 534; Balport Constr. Co. v. New York Tel. Co., 134 A.D.2d 309).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.