PEOPLE v. TINSLEY

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that defendant actively participated in the sale. "The totality of circumstances * * * establish that defendant intentionally aided in the transaction rather than merely advising the undercover officer where drugs could be purchased" ( People v. Rivera, 241 A.D.2d 305; see also, People v. Ayers, 189 A.D.2d 680, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 967).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.