MOZEE v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Mozee appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. Mozee contends that the motion court clearly erred in ruling that trial counsel was not ineffective.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. A published opinion would luck precedential value. A memorandum as to the reasons for our decision has been furnished to the parties. Rule 84.16 (b).