Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ANDREULA v. STEINWAY BARAQAFOOD CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 20, 1997
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Dunkin Donuts of New York, Inc., and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

This action arises out of a motor vehicle accident in which an employee of a franchisee of the defendant Dunkin Donuts of New York, Inc., lost control of his delivery vehicle and struck a pedestrian. The evidence submitted in support of and in opposition to the appellant's motion for summary judgment established that it did not hire the driver, maintain control over its franchisee's hiring practices, or maintain the right to direct and control the manner of performing the very work in the course of which the accident occurred. Accordingly, the appellant's motion for summary judgment should have been granted ( see, Abreu v. Getty Ref. Mktg. Co., 121 A.D.2d 419).

Rosenblatt, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.