MATTER OF VISTOCCI v. SEEBECK

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother did not allege any reason to justify a reconsideration of the visitation order dated February 17, 1993, entered upon consent of the parties, inasmuch as no material change in circumstances was presented ( see, Family Ct Act § 467 [b] [ii]; Matter of Induddi v. Moore, 214 A.D.2d 616). The mother's remaining contention is without merit.

Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.