PEOPLE v. STANDBERRY

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court improperly interfered with his ability to present his defense is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Jones, 239 A.D.2d 602). In any event, the defendant was allowed to present his justification defense and the trial court's conduct in sustaining an objection to a question asked of the defendant during his direct testimony did not deprive the defendant of his right to a fair trial ( see, People v. Jones, supra).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.

Copertino, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.