PEOPLE v. MENDOZA

Evidence of uncharged narcotics transactions was properly admitted to establish intent to sell. The high probative value of the evidence outweighed the potential prejudice to defendant ( see, People v. Hernandez, 216 A.D.2d 11, 12, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 795), and the People were not required to rest on the inferences flowing from the charged sale ( see, People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 245).

We have considered defendant's other claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.