RAMEAU v. KING

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the defendant's motion is granted.

The evidence submitted by the defendant made out a prima facie case ( see, CPLR 3212 [b]) that the plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The only medical evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion, an affirmed report prepared by the plaintiff's treating chiropractor, did not constitute competent evidence ( see, CPLR 2106; Feintuch v. Grella, 209 A.D.2d 377).

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.