- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. CRISANO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Feb 2, 1998
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property that was the subject of the search. Therefore, he is without standing to contest the validity of the search and the resulting seizure of physical evidence found inside the subject premises ( see, People v. Ponder, 54 N.Y.2d 160).
The defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel rest upon matters which are dehors the record and therefore cannot be reviewed on this appeal.
Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.