PITTONI v. BOLAND

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff had a right to an accounting from his former partners ( see, Partnership Law § 74; Arrants v. Dell Angelo, 73 A.D.2d 633). Contrary to the defendants' contention, allegations of the plaintiff's unclean hands will not relieve them of their duty to account to the plaintiff ( see, Dwyer v. Nicholson, 109 A.D.2d 862, 863; Bell v. Herzog, 39 A.D.2d 813).

The defendants' remaining contention is without merit.

Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.