SORICE v. CAPTREE HOMES

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the injured plaintiff assumed the risks, inherent in the sport of roller-blading, as well as those arising from the open and obvious condition of the road on which he was traveling ( see, Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471; Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432; Steward v. Town of Clarkstown, 224 A.D.2d 405; Kensy v. Village of Southampton, 206 A.D.2d 506).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.