JIRON v. CHINA BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate the prior order entered on its default since the appellant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for its default ( see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Matter of Fierro v. Fierro, 211 A.D.2d 676).

O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.