CHAWLA v. CRAVATH, SWAINE MOORE

So much of the order as denied reargument is nonappealable (see, Sioris v. 25 W. 43rd St. Co., 223 A.D.2d 475). Renewal was properly denied for failure to show that the alleged new facts were unavailable at the time of the original motion (see, Pahl Equip. Corp. v. Kassis, 182 A.D.2d 22, 27, lv denied and dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 1005). We would add that the alleged new facts do not in any event undermine the finding that defendant's articulated reason for terminating plaintiff is nonpretextual ( 245 A.D.2d 180).

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.