PEOPLE v. ROSE

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed

There was no violation of Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79) in this case ( see, People v. Durant, 250 A.D.2d 698).

Moreover, contrary to the defendant's claim, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05) or without merit.

Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.